<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<XML><RECORDS>
<RECORD>
	<REFERENCE_TYPE>0</REFERENCE_TYPE>
	<AUTHORS>
		<AUTHOR>Edward H. Allison</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Allison L. Perry</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Marie-Caroline Badjeck</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>W. Neil Adger</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Katrina Brown</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Declan Conway</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Ashley S. Halls</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Graham M. Pilling</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>John D. Reynolds</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Neil L. Andrew</AUTHOR>
		<AUTHOR>Nicholas K. Dulvy</AUTHOR>
	</AUTHORS>
	<YEAR>2009</YEAR>
	<TITLE>Vulnerability of national economies to the impacts of climate change on ﬁsheries</TITLE>
	<SECONDARY_TITLE>F I S H  and F I S H E R I E S</SECONDARY_TITLE>
	<VOLUME> 10</VOLUME>
	<PAGES>173–1</PAGES>
	<ABSTRACT>Anthropogenic  global  warming  has  signi&iuml;&not;cantly  in&iuml;&not;uenced  physical  and  biological processes  at  global  and  regional  scales.  The  observed  and  anticipated  changes  in global  climate  present  signi&iuml;&not;cant  opportunities  and  challenges  for  societies  and economies.  We  compare  the  vulnerability  of  132  national  economies  to  potential climate change impacts on their capture &iuml;&not;sheries using an indicator-based approach.
Countries in Central and Western Africa (e.g. Malawi, Guinea, Senegal, and Uganda), Peru   and   Colombia   in   north-western   South   America,   and   four   tropical   Asian countries  (Bangladesh,  Cambodia,  Pakistan,  and  Yemen)  were  identi&iuml;&not;ed  as  most vulnerable. This vulnerability was due to the combined effect of predicted warming, the  relative  importance  of  &iuml;&not;sheries  to  national  economies  and  diets,  and  limited societal  capacity  to  adapt  to  potential  impacts  and  opportunities.  Many  vulnerable countries were also among the world&acirc;s least developed countries whose inhabitants are among the world&acirc;s poorest and twice as reliant on &iuml;&not;sh, which provides  27% of dietary  protein  compared  to  13%  in  less  vulnerable  countries.  These  countries  also
produce  20%  of  the  world&acirc;s  &iuml;&not;sh  exports  and  are  in  greatest  need  of  adaptation planning to maintain or enhance the contribution that   &iuml;&not;sheries can make to poverty reduction.  Although  the  precise  impacts  and  direction  of  climate-driven  change  for particular &iuml;&not;sh stocks and  &iuml;&not;sheries are uncertain, our analysis suggests they are likely to  lead  to  either  increased  economic  hardship  or  missed  opportunities  for development in countries that depend upon &iuml;&not;sheries but lack the capacity to adapt.</ABSTRACT>
</RECORD>
</RECORDS></XML>